GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) statistics: applications, market and future outlook

The Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) is an essential strategic pillar for all companies wishing to strengthen their visibility in the age of artificial intelligence. The massive arrival of generative engines, the evolution of user journeys and the transformation of SEO practices make GEO an essential lever for capturing qualified and sustainable traffic. This guide brings together, structures, and analyzes GEO statistics the most recent from international sources, in order to offer digital marketing professionals a complete reference to manage their decisions and maximize their performance in 2026.

‍

📊 Key GEO figures in 2025-2026

‍

‍

💡 What this data reveals

‍

• ✓ The explosive growth in AI traffic (+300% and +520% for retail) requires the integration of GEO into any digital visibility strategy now.
• ✓ The explosion of clickless searches (60%) and the fall in CTR to position 1 (2.6%) require a complete rethink of SEO performance measurement and to prioritize citation in AI responses.
• ✓ Visitors from AI are 4.4 times more qualified, which more than compensates for the drop in volume and justifies priority investment in GEO.
• ✓ With 1.8 billion AI users and 1.5 billion using Google AI Overview, ignoring GEO is like being invisible to a massive and exponentially growing audience.
• ✓ The GEO market is showing a CAGR of 34%, signaling a major opportunity for businesses that adopt these practices before their competitors.

‍

GEO market and investments in optimization for generative engines

‍

‍

💡 What this data reveals

‍

• ✓ The GEO market will be multiplied by 8 by 2031 (from $886 million to $7.3 billion), creating a massive opportunity for companies that are now positioning themselves as experts in optimization for generative engines.
• ✓ With 4 billion daily prompts and 1.13 billion monthly visits generated, AI has become a major acquisition channel that already exceeds many traditional channels in volume.
• ✓ AI marketing budgets are growing by 28.9% per year, signaling that businesses that don't invest in GEO now will be far behind their competitors.
• ✓ Only 23% of marketers invest in prompt tracking and GEO measurement, revealing a first-time opportunity to differentiate themselves with advanced GEO analysis and management tools.
• ✓ The French market (39% of Internet users use AI, 18M ChatGPT users) is mature enough to justify an immediate local GEO strategy, not in “a few years”.

‍

Business adoption and transformation of SEO practices

‍

‍

💡 What this data reveals

‍

• ✓ Massive adoption (86% of SEO teams, 91% of agencies) indicates that GEO is no longer an experimental option but an expected standard - not adopting it is tantamount to falling behind schedule.
• ✓ The performance gap of +44% between companies trained and not trained at GEO justifies priority investment in team training even before the purchase of tools.
• ✓ Only 34% of companies have trained their teams in GEO despite 85% using AI to create content, revealing a major risk of poorly optimized content for generative engines.
• ✓ With 57% of professionals requesting AI training but only 28% trained in GEO prompt engineering, there is a clear opportunity for companies to differentiate themselves through GEO expertise.
• ✓ SMEs (41% of GEO adoption) are rapidly catching up with large companies, proving that GEO is not reserved for large budgets but accessible to all sizes of organizations.

‍

Impact on organic visibility and web traffic

‍

‍

💡 What this data reveals

‍

• ✓ The dramatic drop in CTR to position 1 (2.6% with AI Overview) means that traditional SEO strategies focused on ranking have become insufficient - it is now time to aim for the citation in the AI Overview.
• ✓ Impressions increase by +49% but traffic falls by -15 to -35%, creating a paradox that requires new KPIs focused on visibility in AI responses rather than clicks.
• ✓ 63% of companies see an increase in visibility with GEO, proving that this discipline works and is not a theoretical trend but a proven tactic.
• ✓ With 25% of traditional searches doomed to disappear by the end of 2026 and 30% of keywords already displaying an AI Overview, the urgency of adopting GEO is no longer up for debate.
• ✓ The post-reading click rate of only 8% highlights the importance of the quality and relevance of quotations to maximize the traffic generated.

‍

Performance and ROI of generative AI optimization strategies

‍

‍

💡 What this data reveals

‍

• ✓ With 93% of CMOs and 98% of companies using artificial AI seeing a measurable ROI, the “test to see” argument is no longer valid - the GEO delivers proven financial results.
• ✓ The 80-90% reduction in time on routine tasks and the acceleration of +75% in the launch of campaigns by +75% free up massive resources to focus on GEO strategy rather than execution.
• ✓ The +47% improvement in CTR and +40% in productivity means that each euro invested in GEO generates a return much greater than traditional channels, justifying immediate budgetary reallocation.
• ✓ The lack of budget (34.1%) is the main obstacle while the ROI is proven to be +22%, revealing a paradox where companies underinvest in their most profitable channel due to lack of knowledge.
• ✓ 75% of marketers see AI as a competitive advantage, which means that in 2-3 years, not mastering GEO will be a major liability in the face of already expert competitors.

‍

User behaviors in the face of responses generated by AI

‍

‍

💡 What this data reveals

‍

• ✓ 66% of users do not verify AI outputs, which means that being cited by the AI guarantees instant credibility and blind trust - an unparalleled driver of notoriety.
• ✓ 81% of consumers require transparency on AI content, imposing a clear disclosure strategy to avoid a crisis of trust if this requirement is not met.
• ✓ 40-41% trust AI more than organic or paid results, signaling a major disruption in traditional acquisition channels that are losing their perceived authority.
• ✓ 56% made mistakes because of AI, revealing a reputational risk for brands cited in erroneous answers - the quality and accuracy of the source content are becoming critical.
• ✓ Legal risks (23% of extremely concerned executives) require strict governance of GEO content to avoid problematic quotations that would engage brand responsibility.

‍

Generative AI and SEO content creation

‍

‍

💡 What this data reveals

‍

• ✓ 85% of marketers use AI to create content but only 65% prioritize the AI optimization of blogs, revealing a 20% gap where content is produced without a GEO strategy, and therefore invisible to generative engines.
• ✓ 13% of top Google results are already generated by AI, proving that Google does not penalize quality AI content - the excuse of “Google will penalize us” is no longer valid.
• ✓ 84% of marketers better align their content with user intent thanks to AI, pointing out that AI is not just a production tool but fundamentally improves the relevance of content.
• ✓ Only 27% consider human proofreading essential, which is concerning because it exposes us to factual errors that will destroy credibility if the content is cited by the AI with inaccuracies.
• ✓ 47% of AI content is generated via internal tools rather than agencies, indicating a trend towards internalization that requires training teams rather than outsourcing GEO.

‍

Sectoral applications and GEO use cases

‍

‍

💡 What this data reveals

‍

• ✓ 48% of AI quotes come from community platforms and 44% from proprietary sites, requiring a GEO strategy balanced between corporate site optimization and active presence on Reddit/YouTube/LinkedIn.
• ✓ Expert and statistical content increases the probability of citation by +40%, signaling that thought leadership and proprietary data are the most powerful GEO assets.
• ✓ The personalization of web content (33%) is the use case with the greatest potential, suggesting that the dynamic adaptation of content according to the user context is becoming a major competitive advantage.
• ✓ Reddit, YouTube, and LinkedIn dominate AI quotes, justifying priority investment in these platforms rather than dispersion across all social networks.
• ✓ Enhanced competitive analysis (16%) remains underexploited, creating an opportunity for businesses that use AI to monitor and outperform competing GEO strategies.

‍

Technical challenges: indexing, crawling and compatibility with generative engines

‍

‍

💡 What this data reveals

‍

• ✓ 99% of AI Overviews cite the organic top 10, confirming that traditional SEO remains the basis of GEO - you have to rank before being cited, not one or the other.
• ✓ 79% of AI bots favor content from the last 2 years, requiring a continuous refresh strategy rather than producing content and then forgetting it.
• ✓ Pages with H1-H2-H3 hierarchy are 2.8x more likely to be cited, proving that semantic structure is critical - “wall of text” pages are invisible to the AI.
• ✓ 80% of the pages cited use lists and 87% have a unique H1, providing an accurate technical blueprint to optimize any content for GEO.
• ✓ A citation frequency of less than 30% is equivalent to GEO invisibility, requiring regular tracking of the “AI share of voice” as a new priority KPI beyond SEO ranking.

‍

Future perspectives and strategic recommendations for 2026

‍

‍

💡 What this data reveals

‍

• ✓ By 2028, half of the research will be generative, signaling that GEO will go from “nice to have” to “table stakes” in less than 3 years - businesses that wait will lose 3 years ahead of their competitors.
• ✓ GEO techniques improve visibility by +40%, proving that it is not a lottery but a manageable discipline with predictable results if executed well.
• ✓ The 0.7% hallucination rate for Google Gemini shows the increasing reliability of AI engines, reinforcing user confidence and the importance of being well positioned in these results.
• ✓ Anonymization increases trust by +34% and 81% of businesses prioritize it, signaling that GDPR compliance and transparency on data use are becoming indirect GEO ranking factors.
• ✓ 42% increased commercial efficiency via responsible AI proves that ethics is not a hindrance but a business accelerator - companies that are transparent about their use of AI outperform others.

‍

🎯 Conclusion and Recommendations

‍

At the dawn of 2026, Generative Engine Optimization is emerging as the new essential standard for digital visibility.

The data is unequivocal: with a CAGR of 34%, 1.8 billion AI users, 1.8 billion AI users, 60% of searches without clicks and a CTR of 2.6% in position 1 with AI Overview, the traditional SEO paradigm has definitely changed. Businesses that adopt GEO now benefit from a higher ROI of +22%, increased visibility of +40%, and 4.4 times more qualified traffic. The rapid transformation of the market, with 50% of searches that will be generative by 2028 and 25% of traditional searches doomed to disappear by 2026, leaves no room for a wait-and-see attitude.

GEO performance is based on five fundamental pillars: the freshness of the content (79% of AI bots favor content from the last 2 years), the semantic structure (2.8x more chances of citation with the H1-H2-H3 hierarchy), expertise and the citation of sources (expert content +40% probability of citation), transparency and ethics AI (81% of consumers require the disclosure of AI content), and the tracking of the share of voice IA (30% minimum frequency to avoid invisibility).

The emergence of prompt tracking, the explosion of investments in marketing AI (+28.9% per year), and the massive adoption by 86% of SEO teams confirm that GEO is no longer an experiment but a mature discipline with tools, metrics and proven results. Businesses that master GEO today are building a 3- to 5-year sustainable competitive advantage over their competitors, as the learning curve and the accumulation of historical data create significant barriers to entry. The time for observation is over - 2026 is the year of large-scale GEO execution.

‍

🚀 Priority actions for 2026

‍

1. Immediate GEO audit : Analyze the current presence of your brand in the AI responses (ChatGPT, Google AI Overview, Perplexity, Claude) on your 50 strategic queries to establish an AI share of voice baseline and identify visibility gaps vs competitors.
2. Technical content restructuring : Immediately redesign your 20 high-traffic pages to adopt the H1-H2-H3 structure (2.8x more citations), integrate lists (80% of cited pages), add structured FAQs, and guarantee a unique H1 (87% of cited pages) - these quick wins are deployable within 2 weeks.
3. Quarterly refresh program : Set up a schedule for systematically updating all strategic content every 3 months at least (79% of AI bots prefer recent content), with the addition of fresh statistics, updating of examples, and factual verification.
4. Earned media strategy and digital PR : Invest heavily in presence on Reddit, YouTube, LinkedIn, and industry forums (48% of AI citations come from community platforms), by publishing expert thought leadership and proprietary data (+40% citation probability).
5. Mandatory GEO team training : Train 100% of marketing, SEO and content teams in GEO prompt engineering and AI optimization techniques in the next 90 days (performance gap of +44% between trained and untrained teams), with internal certification to ensure the application of best practices.
6. GEO tracking and measurement : Deploy prompt tracking tools (Brand Radar, Promptmonitor, Profound AI) to monitor the citation frequency on a daily basis (critical threshold: 30%), identify competitors who are gaining in AI voice share, and adjust the strategy in real time rather than in reaction.
7. AI transparency policy : Establish a clear disclosure of AI-generated content (81% of consumers require it), an ethical charter for the use of AI, and a systematic fact-checking process to avoid erroneous quotations that would destroy credibility (56% of users made mistakes because of AI).
8. Urgent budgetary reallocation : Immediately transfer 15-20% of traditional SEO/SEA budgets to GEO, prioritizing training, measurement tools, and the production of data-driven expert content rather than pure volume.

‍

FAQS

‍

Understanding GEO (Generative Engine Optimization)

‍

What is GEO (Generative Engine Optimization)?

GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) is the set of techniques and practices aimed at optimizing the visibility of a brand, a website or a content in the responses generated by generative artificial intelligence engines such as ChatGPT, Google AI Overview, Google AI Overview, Perplexity, Claude or Gemini. Unlike traditional SEO, which aims to rank pages in traditional search results, GEO seeks to be cited, mentioned, or recommended directly in the synthetic responses produced by the AI.

‍

What is the difference between GEO and SEO?

SEO (Search Engine Optimization) aims to position web pages in traditional search results to generate clicks to a site. The GEO aims to be cited in AI-generated responses, where the user gets information directly without necessarily clicking. In 2025, 60% of searches end without a click (zero clicks) and the click rate in position 1 with an AI Overview is only 2.6%. However, 99% of AI Overviews cite the organic top 10, which means that SEO is still the basis for GEO - you have to rank well first to have a chance of being cited.

‍

Is GEO going to replace SEO?

GEO complements and transforms SEO without completely replacing it. Data shows that 99% of the quotes in AI Overviews come from the organic top 10 and 87% of the ChatGPT quotes correspond to the Bing top results. Traditional SEO therefore remains the indispensable foundation. However, with 25% of traditional searches doomed to disappear by the end of 2026 and 50% of searches that will be generative in 2028, a purely SEO strategy is becoming insufficient. The winning approach is a hybrid SEO+GEO strategy where traditional ranking is necessary but no longer sufficient alone.

‍

Why is GEO becoming essential in 2026?

Several factors converge: 1.8 billion users already use generative AI tools, more than 50% of Google searches show an AI Overview, 1.5 billion monthly users use Google AI Overview, and 800-900 million weekly active users on ChatGPT. Traffic from AI chatbots to retailers exploded by +520% between 2024 and 2025. Ignoring GEO in 2026 means making yourself invisible to a massive and exponentially growing audience, especially since visitors from AI are 4.4 times more qualified than those from traditional research.

‍

GEO market and business opportunities

‍

What is the size of the GEO market?

The global GEO market was $886 million in 2024 and is expected to reach $7.3 billion in 2031, an 8-fold increase in 7 years. The compound annual growth rate (CAGR) is 34%, making it one of the fastest growing digital marketing segments. For comparison, global investments in AI marketing reached $57.99 billion in 2025 with growth of +28.9% per year.

‍

How much budget do businesses spend on AI and GEO?

In 2025, 19% of marketing budgets are dedicated to AI and martech technologies, with an annual growth of 28.9%. This upward trend is confirmed by the fact that 90% of marketers plan to increase their AI investments. However, only 23% of marketers are currently investing in prompt tracking and GEO measurement, revealing a first-mover opportunity for businesses that position themselves quickly with advanced analytics tools.

‍

What is the ROI of GEO for businesses?

The data is very convincing: 93% of CMOs and 83% of marketing teams see a measurable ROI from generative AI. Businesses using AI in their marketing have an ROI that is +22% higher than the average. More specifically, 98% of companies using agent AI report a positive ROI, and 63% of companies that have optimized for GEO notice an increase in visibility. GEO techniques improve visibility in generative engines by +40% on average.

‍

Is GEO only for large companies with big budgets?

No, the GEO is accessible to all organization sizes. Data shows that 41% of SMEs have already adopted GEO content creation, quickly catching up with larger businesses. In addition, 47% of AI content is generated via internal tools rather than expensive agencies, which shows that an in-house approach with team training is quite viable for limited budgets. The performance gap of +44% between trained and untrained teams shows that investing in training takes precedence over the purchase of expensive tools.

‍

Impact on web traffic and visibility

‍

How does generative AI impact organic traffic?

The impact is twofold and paradoxical. On the one hand, organic traffic has fallen by -15 to -35% since the appearance of generative AI, and the click rate for the first position in the presence of an AI Overview is only 2.6%. On the other hand, impressions increased by +49% following the launch of AI Overviews, and above all, visitors from AI responses are 4.4 times more qualified than those from traditional search. The strategy must therefore evolve from pure volume to quality and conversion, with new KPIs focused on visibility in AI responses rather than just clicks.

‍

What is “zero clicks” and how does it impact my strategy?

“Zero-clicks” refers to searches where the user gets their answer directly on the results page or in an AI response, without clicking on any links. In 2025, 60% of searches end without a click. In addition, 58% of information searches result in an AI insight. This requires rethinking the KPIs: instead of measuring only clicks, it is necessary to measure the visibility in AI responses, the frequency of brand quotations (minimum 30% to avoid invisibility), and the share of voice in generative results. With the post-reading click rate on AI summaries being only 8%, the quality of the quotations becomes essential.

‍

What are the new KPIs to follow for GEO?

Essential GEO KPIs include: (1) Citation frequency - minimum 30% to avoid invisibility; (2) Share of voice AI - share of quotes vs competitors on your strategic queries; (3) Brand mention rate in generative responses; (4) Position in quotes; (4) Position in quotes - being cited first vs last makes a major difference; (5) Quality of AI traffic - conversion rate of visitors from AI (4.4x) more qualified); (6) Thematic coverage - percentage of your strategic topics where you are mentioned. The volume of gross traffic becomes secondary to these qualitative metrics.

‍

Why are my SEO positions no longer ensuring my traffic?

Because the CTR in position 1 is only 2.6% in the presence of an AI Overview, and 30% of US desktop keywords already show an AI Overview. Even in position 1, traffic is significantly reduced compared to the historical 25-30% CTR. However, being in the top 10 is still crucial because 99% of AI Overviews cite the organic top 10. The difference is that you now have to optimize to be mentioned in the AI Overview, not just to rank. Impressions increase by +49% but traffic falls, creating a new paradigm where visibility no longer automatically translates into clicks.

‍

Adoption and implementation of GEO in business

‍

What is the current level of adoption of GEO?

Adoption is already massive and accelerating rapidly: 86% of enterprise SEO teams integrated AI in 2025, 91% of American advertising agencies are using or exploring generative AI, and 85% of marketers are using AI for content creation. More specifically for GEO, 63% of marketers prioritize generative research in their strategy. However, only 34% of companies have trained their teams in GEO, revealing a skills gap that must be filled quickly to avoid producing poorly optimized content.

‍

What are the obstacles to the adoption of GEO?

The main obstacle is the lack of budget (34.1%), which is paradoxical given the proven ROI of +22%. Other concerns include AI legal risks (23% of executives extremely concerned) and excessive automation (17%). The lack of skills is also a major obstacle: only 28% of marketers are trained in GEO prompt engineering, although 57% of professionals require AI training. This situation creates an opportunity for businesses that are rapidly investing in GEO training and expertise.

‍

What is the importance of team training at GEO?

Training is critical and offers immediate measurable feedback. The data shows a performance gap of +44% between companies that trained their teams in GEO and those that did not. However, only 34% of businesses have trained their teams despite 85% using AI to create content. This gap of 51 points reveals a major risk of poorly optimized content. With 57% of professionals requesting AI training, the opportunity is clear to differentiate themselves through GEO expertise before the competition becomes widespread.

‍

Where do you start to set up a GEO strategy?

Start with these essential steps: (1) GEO audit - analyze your current presence in ChatGPT, Google AI Overview, Perplexity and Claude on your 50 strategic queries to establish a baseline of share of voice; (2) Technical quick wins - restructure your 20 high-traffic pages - restructure your 20 high-traffic pages with a clear H1-H2-H3 hierarchy (2.8x more chances of citation), add lists (80% of the pages cited use them), guarantee a unique H1 (87% of the pages cited); (3) Quarterly refresh program - 79% of AI bots prefer content from the last 2 years; ( 4) Team training - train your teams before investing in expensive tools (+44% performance).

‍

Should GEO be outsourced or managed internally?

The trend is clearly towards internalization: 47% of AI content is generated via internal tools rather than external agencies. This approach offers more personalization, responsiveness and quality control. However, it requires a serious investment in training: 44% of content strategy teams are already conducting AI efforts internally. The recommended approach is hybrid: internalize production and daily optimization (with mandatory team training), but rely on external experts for initial audit, team training and strategic advice on GEO developments.

‍

Technical aspects of GEO

‍

What are the technical factors that influence the GEO ranking?

Major technical factors include: (1) Content freshness - 79% of AI bots index content from the last 2 years primarily, 89% that from the last 3 years; (2) Semantic structure - pages with an H1-H2-H3 hierarchy are 2.8x more likely to be cited; (3) Lists and lists - 80% of cited pages use lists; (4) H1 unique - 87% of cited pages are 2.8x more likely to be cited; (3) Lists and lists - 80% of cited pages use lists; (4) Unique H1 - 87% of pages cited have a unique H1; (5) traditional SEO - 99% of AI Overviews cite the organic top 10, so the classic ranking remains fundamental.

‍

How often should I update my content for GEO?

At least quarterly for strategic pages. Data shows that 79% of AI bots index content from the last two years and 65% specifically target content published in 2025. Freshness is critical: pages that are not updated regularly gradually lose their AI citation potential. An effective strategy is to set up a refresh schedule with the addition of recent statistics, updated examples, and factual verification to limit the risks of being associated with outdated or erroneous information.

‍

What content structure favors citation by AI?

The optimal structure includes: (1) unique and descriptive H1 (87% of pages cited); (2) Clear H1-H2-H3 hierarchy (2.8x more chances of citation); (3) Bulleted or numbered lists (80% of pages cited); (4) Structured FAQ (4) Structured FAQ (very high correlation with GEO presence); (5) Clear Entity Definitions; (6) Data Tables; (7) of Citations sources and statistics (+40% probability of citation). Absolutely avoid “walls of text” without structure - they are invisible to the AI that favors clearly segmented and easily extractable content.

‍

Is AI-generated content penalized by Google or generative engines?

No, the data proves the opposite: 13% of the content in Google's top results is already generated by AI. Google and other engines don't penalize quality AI content. What's important is quality, accuracy, and added value, not the production method. However, 81% of consumers think that businesses should report AI-generated content, imposing a requirement for transparency. Moreover, only 27% deem human proofreading essential, which is concerning because factual errors (56% of users made mistakes because of AI) will destroy credibility if content is cited with inaccuracies.

‍

What tools should I use to measure my GEO performance?

Emerging GEO measurement tools include Brand Radar (Ahrefs), Promptmonitor, and Profound AI. These tools allow you to: (1) Monitor the frequency of quoting your brand (critical threshold: 30%); (2) Measure your AI voice share vs competitors; (3) Identify requests where you are absent from AI responses; (4) Track the evolution of your quotations over time; (5) Analyze the sources cited by your competitors. The emergence of prompt tracking as a GEO strategic discipline is confirmed, although only 23% of marketers are currently investing in it, creating an opportunity for differentiation.

‍

Content strategy and sources for GEO

‍

What type of content is cited the most by AI engines?

The most cited contents are: (1) Expert content with statistics - increase the probability of being cited by +40%; (2) Data-driven educational guides; (3) Optimized blog posts - 65% of US leaders make it a priority; (4) “solution-focused” pages - increase the probability of being cited by +40%; (5) Content with FAQ, lists and entity definitions. Expertise and proprietary data are the most powerful GEO assets, which is why thought leadership on platforms like LinkedIn, Reddit, and YouTube generates proportionally more quotes than generic content.

‍

Where do AI quotes for brands come from?

The distribution of sources is revealing: 48% of AI quotes come from community platforms (Reddit, forums, YouTube, LinkedIn) and 44% from proprietary sites. The most cited platforms are Reddit, YouTube, and LinkedIn. This requires a multi-channel GEO strategy beyond the corporate site, with a strong investment in digital PR and community presence. The optimal approach combines the optimization of the proprietary site (technical structure, freshness, expertise) with an active thought leadership strategy on community platforms to maximize citation sources.

‍

Should we prioritize the volume or the quality of the content for GEO?

Definitely quality. Visitors from AI are 4.4 times more qualified than those from traditional search, which more than compensates for the drop in volume. In addition, expert and statistical content increases the probability of citation by +40%. The “content at scale” approach, produced massively by AI without human supervision, is risky: 56% of users have made mistakes because of AI, and being cited in an erroneous answer can destroy brand credibility. 10 well-optimized expert pieces of content are better than 100 mediocre pieces of content, especially since only 27% consider human proofreading essential, exposing them to the risk of inaccuracies.

‍

How do I optimize my blog posts for GEO?

Blogging optimization is strategic: 65% of US managers make it a priority and 42% use AI to produce long SEO texts. Key steps: (1) Clear H1-H2-H3 structure (2.8x more citations); (2) Introduction with unique H1 (87% of cited pages); (3) Lists and bullet points (80% of pages cited); (4) FAQ at the end of the article (strong GEO correlation); (5) Statistics and figures (+40% probability of citation); (6) Quotes from expert sources; (7) Comparison tables; (8) Quarterly update to ensure freshness (79% of AI bots prefer recent content).

‍

What strategy for earned media and social platforms?

The earned media strategy is crucial since 48% of AI citations come from community platforms. Priority actions: (1) Publish thought leadership on Reddit, LinkedIn and YouTube (the most cited platforms); (2) Participate actively in sectoral forums; (3) Get mentions in the specialized press; (4) Create proprietary data (+40% probability of citation) that the media will cite; (5) Encourage expert content on communities. The objective is to be present where AI engines find their sources, not only to optimize your proprietary site.

‍

User behaviors and trust

‍

Do users trust AI responses?

Trust is mixed but significant: 46% of users trust AI systems, 44% trust AI summaries, and 43% trust AI chatbots. Even more revealing, 40% of generative AI users trust AI more than traditional search and 41% trust it more than paid results. However, 28% of American adults don't trust AI results, creating significant segmentation between early adopters and skeptics. This growing trust reinforces the importance of being well positioned in AI citations.

‍

Are users verifying the information provided by the AI?

This is the most critical point: 66% of users rely on AI outputs without verifying accuracy. This means that being cited by AI guarantees instant credibility and blind trust - an unparalleled driver of notoriety. But it's also a major risk: 56% of users have made mistakes because of AI. For brands, this imposes a double responsibility: to ensure the accuracy of their source content (because they will be cited without verification), and to anticipate potential hallucinations that could associate their brand with erroneous information.

‍

Are consumers demanding transparency on AI content?

Yes, massively: 81% of consumers think that businesses should report AI-generated content. This requirement for transparency has become unavoidable and will probably be reinforced by future regulations. Businesses that ignore this expectation risk a major crisis of trust if their use of AI is discovered without disclosure. The recommended approach is a clear transparency policy with: (1) disclosure of AI-generated content; (2) ethical charter for the use of AI; (3) systematic fact-checking process to avoid erroneous quotations.

‍

What are the main concerns around AI?

Concerns vary between audiences. For executives: AI legal risks are the top concern (23% extremely concerned), followed by excessive automation (17%). For users: 56% made mistakes because of AI, creating legitimate concerns about reliability. For businesses: 81% prioritize anonymization to build trusted AI, and anonymization increases trust by +34%. These concerns require strict GEO content governance and an ethical approach to AI.

‍

How does responsible AI impact business performance?

Responsible AI is not a hindrance but a business accelerator. Data shows that 34% of businesses are seeing increased consumer trust thanks to responsible AI, 42% report increased business efficiency, and 29% are seeing an improved reputation. Anonymization increases trust by +34%, and 81% of businesses prioritize it to build trusted AI. Companies that are transparent about their use of AI therefore outperform others, confirming that ethics and performance are not contradictory but complementary.

‍

Future perspectives and developments in GEO

‍

How will GEO evolve in the next 2-3 years?

The projections are clear: 50% of searches will be generative in 2028 and 25% of traditional searches will disappear by the end of 2026. The GEO will therefore go from “nice to have” to “table stakes” in less than 3 years. The GEO market will grow from $886 million (2024) to $7.3 billion in 2031. Expected developments include: (1) Standardization of GEO measurement tools; (2) Emergence of GEO metrics in Google Search Console; (3) Regulations on the disclosure of AI content; (4) Increased differentiation by AI platform (optimize differently for ChatGPT vs Gemini vs Claude); (5) GEO integration in SEO certifications.

‍

Should you optimize differently for each AI engine?

Yes, more and more. The differences are already significant: 87% of ChatGPT quotes correspond to the top Bing results (therefore important Bing optimization), and 99% of Google AI Overviews cite the organic Google top 10. In addition, the Google Gemini hallucination rate is only 0.7%, showing high reliability. Each platform has its own data sources, selection algorithms, and citation criteria. The “one size fits all” approach is becoming insufficient. It is necessary to monitor and optimize by platform, especially for the dominant platforms: Google AI Overview (1.5 billion users), ChatGPT (800-900M weekly active users), Perplexity, Claude.

‍

Will GEO replace other marketing channels?

The GEO does not replace but profoundly transforms existing channels. Revealing data: 40% of AI users trust AI more than traditional search and 41% more than paid results, signaling a major disruption in SEO and SEA. GEO acts as a cross-channel amplifier: it values SEO (99% of quotations come from the top 10), boosts earned media (48% of quotations come from community platforms), and reduces dependence on SEA (41% trust SEA less than AI). The optimal approach is integrated: SEO for the basic ranking + GEO for the quotations + earned media for the diversification of sources.

‍

Is GEO a passing trend or a permanent change?

It is definitely a permanent and structural change. Indicators: (1) 1.8 billion AI users - an irreversible critical mass; (2) GEO market multiplied by 8 by 2031 - massive investments confirming sustainability; (3) 86% of SEO teams have integrated AI - widespread adoption not experimental; (4) widespread adoption not experimental; (4) 90% of marketers plan to increase their AI investments - confirmed upward trend; (5) 50% of generative research in 2028 - Gartner projection validating the transformation permanent. GEO is not a trend but the natural evolution of search in a world where AI is becoming the main interface for accessing information.

‍

Sources:

https://www.squid-impact.fr/geo-seo-ia-chiffres-visibilite-en-ligne/
https://vlad-cerisier.fr/generative-engine-optimization-geo/
https://m-copywriting.fr/generative-engine-optimization/
https://formation.ccmbenchmark.com/actualite/seo-sea-ou-geo-qui-sera-le-levier-gagnant-en-2026-face-lia-generative
https://vingtdeux.fr/generative-engine-optimization/
https://bofu.ca/blogs/le-haut-de-l-entonnoir/seo-et-geo-en-2026-du-referencement-au-search-everywhere-optimization?srsltid=AfmBOorMu7wa5-7pXUVTJzMG98cdRE58Sx8SjId7qD_4uM9cC4fHiR9s
https://artios.io/generative-engine-optimization-statistics-usa/
https://agence-anode.fr/blog/marketing-digital/generative-engine-optimization-geo/
https://www.natural-net.fr/blog-agence-web/2025/12/05/seo-et-recherche-ia-sur-les-llm-en-2026-les-tendances-et-ruptures-de-l-annee-a-venir-.html
https://www.seo.com/fr/ai/ai-seo-statistics/