Tech for Retail 2025 Workshop: From SEO to GEO – Gaining Visibility in the Era of Generative Engines

Back to blog

Sitemaps in Google Search Console: Managing Indexation

SEO

Discover Incremys

The 360° Next Gen SEO Platform

Request a demo
Last updated on

22/2/2026

Chapter 01

Example H2
Example H3
Example H4
Example H5
Example H6

This specialist guide complements our main Google Search Console Indexing article by focusing specifically on managing sitemaps in Search Console. When configured properly, sitemaps facilitate page discovery and technical monitoring, but they do not guarantee indexation. Effective use helps optimise crawling and identify indexation problems quickly.

 

Sitemaps in Google Search Console: create, submit and optimise indexation

 

 

Why a sitemap remains useful even with solid internal linking

 

Effective internal linking structures navigation, but sitemaps play a complementary role: they explicitly signal to Google which URLs you consider priority and indexable. They prove indispensable during launches, migrations, or for pages with few internal links. Search Console allows you to verify file processing and quickly identify declaration or indexation errors.

 

What Google actually analyses: discovery, crawling and indexation

 

It is essential to distinguish between: discovery (Google learns a URL exists), crawling (the bot visits the page), and indexation (the page is retained in the index). Sitemaps accelerate discovery and facilitate diagnostics, but indexation depends on page quality and relevance. Search Console enables you to compare submitted URLs with those actually indexed to target corrective actions.

 

Creating a compliant sitemap: formats, rules and pitfalls to avoid

 

 

Choosing the right structure: XML sitemap, index and segmentation

 

The XML format (sitemap.xml) is standard. For large-scale sites, a sitemap index (referencing multiple segmented sitemaps by page type or language) facilitates monitoring and diagnostics. This segmentation enables rapid problem isolation by section (products, blog, categories, etc.).

 

Limiting volumes and segmenting by page types

 

Segmenting by page type (blog, products, categories) enables targeted analysis and avoids global errors. Create a sitemap index and stable thematic sitemaps for each strategic section.

 

Managing multilingual and multi-country without duplication

 

For multilingual or multi-country sites, segment your sitemaps by language or country to avoid duplicates and ensure consistency with hreflang tags. Ensure each sitemap accurately reflects the site's international structure.

 

Defining which URLs to include (and exclude) to send the right signals

 

Include only canonical, indexable, accessible URLs (status 200) that are relevant. Avoid placing noindex pages, redirects, 404 errors or low-value SEO pages.

 

Parameters, filters and facets: avoiding low-value SEO URLs

 

Exclude URLs generated by filters, facets or parameters that provide no stable value. Prioritise editorialised and strategic pages.

 

Noindex, redirects and 404s: why they should be removed from the file

 

Remove noindex URLs, redirects or error pages from the sitemap: this avoids sending contradictory signals and improves monitoring relevance in Search Console.

 

Tags and metadata: lastmod, changefreq, priority and real impact

 

The lastmod tag is useful if it reflects a genuine modification. The changefreq and priority fields have minimal impact on crawling: prioritise signal reliability over proliferation.

 

Hosting the file and making it accessible: technical prerequisites

 

 

Recommended location, naming and HTTP(S) accessibility

 

Place the sitemap at the domain root (https://www.example.com/sitemap.xml) or expose a sitemap index. The file must be publicly accessible, in HTTPS, and return status 200.

 

Declaring the sitemap in robots.txt: when it is relevant

 

Adding the sitemap URL to the robots.txt file facilitates automatic discovery by bots and reduces oversights during technical changes. To better understand the role of search engine bots, refer to our SEO glossary.

 

Advanced cases: CDN, subdomains, directories and Search Console properties

 

When using CDN, subdomains or directories, ensure the sitemap only lists URLs belonging to the Search Console property scope. Verify that Googlebot can access the file without technical blocking.

 

Submitting a sitemap and interpreting the report in the console

 

 

Submission steps: property, path, validation and deployment

 

After property validation, indicate the sitemap URL in Search Console. Verify the URL is accurate, accessible and in correct XML format. The console displays processing status and last read date.

 

Understanding the indicators: discovered, submitted and indexed URLs

 

The sitemaps report enables you to monitor the volume of detected URLs and compare with the indexation report. Gaps between submitted and indexed URLs reveal duplication, quality or technical configuration problems.

 

When to resubmit the file and how to manage updates

 

If the sitemap is generated automatically, Google will re-read it regularly. After major changes (massive page additions, migration), a new submission accelerates processing. The sitemap must always reflect site reality.

 

Verifying and testing a sitemap: reliable methods before and after submission

 

 

Essential checks: HTTP status, encoding, XML structure and absolute URLs

 

Before submission, verify: HTTP 200 status, public accessibility, valid XML structure, absolute URLs. These checks prevent the majority of processing errors.

 

Validating a sample via URL inspection to confirm indexability

 

Select a sample of pages and use URL inspection in Search Console to verify accessibility, canonical, absence of robots/noindex blocking and rendering consistency.

 

Explaining gaps: valid file but pages not indexed

 

An accepted sitemap but few indexed pages often indicates canonicalisation problems, robots directives or content quality issues. The sitemap then serves to reveal these discrepancies.

 

Canonical, robots, noindex and content quality: most common causes

 

Main exclusion causes are: divergent canonical, robots.txt or noindex blocking, weak or overly similar content, technical problems (errors, JS rendering, uncontrolled parameters).

 

Correcting common errors reported by the console

 

 

URL errors: inaccessible, incorrect or forbidden

 

Correct at source: remove obsolete URLs, update redirects, and ensure only final, canonical and indexable URLs appear in the file.

 

Format errors: invalid XML, missing tags, non-compliant values

 

Stabilise automatic sitemap generation and systematically check the file before deployment to avoid blocking format errors.

 

Size and volume limits: compression and sitemap indexes

 

For high-volume sites, segment via a sitemap index and compress files (.gz) to optimise bandwidth and facilitate section-by-section diagnostics.

 

Host inconsistencies: www, https and domain variations

 

List only URLs corresponding to the canonical site version (https, www or non-www) to avoid scope errors and unnecessary redirects.

 

Automating management at scale with the Search Console API

 

 

Use cases: submission, monitoring and multi-property alerting via API

 

The Search Console API enables automated submission, monitoring and alerting on sitemap statuses, particularly for multi-domain or high-volume sites. This helps detect anomalies quickly (inaccessible sitemap, drop in detected URLs).

 

Best practices: frequency, quotas and access governance

 

Respect API quotas, define appropriate frequency (daily or weekly), and clarify access and alert management to ensure reactivity in case of incidents.

 

Implementing operational monitoring: logs, alerts and prioritising fixes

 

Centralise submission logs, implement alerts on abnormal variations, and prioritise corrections on high-stakes segments. This approach improves technical hygiene and overall SEO performance. To contextualise the stakes, find consolidated data in our SEO statistics.

 

Frequently asked questions about sitemaps and their management

 

 

How do I create a sitemap suitable for Google?

 

Generate an XML sitemap listing only canonical, indexable URLs with 200 status. For large sites, use a sitemap index to segment by page type or language. Add lastmod only for genuine modifications.

 

How do I find a site's sitemap and verify its accessibility?

 

Test standard locations (/sitemap.xml, /sitemap_index.xml), check the robots.txt file and ensure the sitemap is public, in HTTPS and returns 200 status.

 

How do I test a sitemap to avoid indexation errors?

 

Check technical validity (HTTP 200, XML, absolute URLs), then inspect a sample of URLs in Search Console to verify actual indexability.

 

Where should I place the file so it is properly discovered?

 

Place it at the domain root and declare it in robots.txt. Verify the URLs belong to the Search Console property scope.

 

Going further with Incremys: industrialising page monitoring and SEO ROI

 

 

Centralising data via Search Console and Google Analytics APIs

 

The Incremys 360° SEO SaaS platform integrates via API with Google Search Console and Google Analytics to centralise technical signals, including sitemaps, and cross-reference them with traffic and conversion indicators.

 

Prioritising corrections and content production with a data-driven approach

 

The Incremys SEO 360° Audit consolidates indexation and error signals to accelerate diagnostics and organise fixes. To deepen your knowledge of SEO, GEO and digital marketing, consult the Incremys blog.

Discover other items

See all

Next-Gen GEO/SEO starts here

Complete the form so we can contact you.

The new generation of SEO
is on!

Thank you for your request, we will get back to you as soon as possible.

Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.